Final answer:
Radical conflict theory, unlike conservative conflict theory, posits that socioeconomic inequalities are fundamental to capitalist societies and require radical changes for equitable resource distribution, advocating for the dismantling of capitalist structures.
Step-by-step explanation:
The key distinction between conservative conflict theory and radical conflict theory lies in their approach to power structures and social change. Conservative conflict theory may acknowledge the existence of social stratification and inequality primarily as a by-product of social function, suggesting gradual reform within the confines of the existing society. In contrast, radical conflict theory boldly asserts that social inequalities arise from fundamental class conflicts and the domination by those who control the means of production. Radical theorists would advocate for more revolutionary changes in the structure of society, aiming to dismantle the existing system that perpetuates class disparities.
As such, the statement true of radical conflict theory but not of conservative conflict theory is that it views socioeconomic inequalities as an integral part of capitalist societies that necessitate radical, systemic change to achieve a more equitable distribution of resources. Radical theorists interpret economic recessions, exploitation of labor, and the wealth gap as deliberate constructs of capitalist systems, designed to benefit the bourgeoisie at the expense of the proletariat. They seek to address these issues not through minor adjustments but by challenging the foundation of capitalist society itself.