Final answer:
Marji believes a king is chosen by divine right, while her father likely disagrees, hinting at alternative methods of monarchical selection, such as those practiced in the Meroitic kingdom.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Marji, a king is chosen by divine right, implying that God has selected the ruler. However, her father reacts by providing a contrasting view of monarchy, suggesting it is not necessarily God's will but may involve other processes, possibly indicating that the selection of a king could involve human interventions such as political decisions or force.
To illustrate this, other texts show varied methods of choosing kings, such as the Meroitic kingdom, where a monarch was selected by a group of local chiefs, military officials, and high officials, rather than by divine right.
Here, the father may be insinuating the complexities and nuances involved in a monarchy’s leadership succession that contrast Marji's simplified belief.
Marji's father's reaction can indicate his skepticism or disagreement with the notion of divine selection of a monarch and possibly suggest a more grounded and potentially democratic or merit-based approach to leadership succession.
This reaction could illustrate a difference in understanding and teaching about the nature of governance and authority between generations or different societal groups.