Final answer:
The concept of Distributive Justice debates the fairness of wealth and income distribution in America, which is marked by significant inequality. Different ideologies propose varying standards for what is considered a just distribution, with quintile measurements used to evaluate wealth disparities. This inequality can also relate to perceived injustices within the criminal justice system.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question at hand addresses the concept of Distributive Justice in the context of U.S. society, and whether the current distribution of wealth and income is just. Distributive justice involves the moral principles that oversee the allocation of wealth, goods, and services with the aim of achieving fairness. The wealth distribution in the United States is more unequal compared to income distribution. Differences in income can accumulate over time, exacerbating wealth disparities. We can gauge the inequality in wealth using quintile measurements from data such as the Survey of Consumer Finance by the Federal Reserve Bank.
The justice of such distribution might be evaluated by considering various ideologies that propose different standards for what is fair or just. Some advocate for needs-based distribution ensuring support for the less fortunate, while others argue for minimum redistribution to uphold personal freedoms. These discussions also touch upon the role of various antipoverty programs and federal income tax in redistributing wealth. Many argue that the current wealth and income disparities influence the justice of the criminal justice system, suggesting that socioeconomic status can impact legal outcomes.