Final answer:
The two production processes that shape the domestic division of labor are traditional family-based production and industrial production. The division of labor significantly increases production efficiency, as demonstrated by Adam Smith's observations of pin factories.
Step-by-step explanation:
The two production processes that hold our current arrangement for the domestic division of labor are traditional subsistence-based production and industrial production. In the traditional subsistence system, work is conducted within extended-family groups, and production and distribution are based on the family's needs and strategies. This contrasts with the industrialism approach, which revolutionized production with the advent of wage labor, machines, and chemical processes, thereby mass-producing commodities. Workers in industrial settings have little control over their work and no ownership of the products they make.When considering the division of labor in an economic sense, it's essential to understand Adam Smith's perspective. Smith observed that if you divide and subdivide tasks, workers can produce significantly more output than if each tried to produce an entire product by themselves. For example, he noted in pin factories, ten workers specialized in different tasks could make 48,000 pins a day compared to a single worker making only 20 pins.In conclusion, the division of labor not only defined the industrial revolution but continues to characterize our contemporary economic systems. It allows for increased production and efficiency by dividing tasks, which is in sharp contrast to traditional family-based production systems.