Final answer:
Concerns about a return to tyranny are justified based on historical examples where civil unrest threatened to undermine democracy, highlighting the necessity of balance between freedom and order to prevent despotism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concern that people may want a return to tyranny is indeed justified within historical context. Leaders like Washington feared that without strong governance, disorder might invite the desire for more autocratic control. The experience with Shays's Rebellion illustrated such tensions between maintaining order and upholding liberty. This rebellion was seen variously, with some like Jefferson interpreting it as a sign of a healthy Republic willing to defend its rights, while others viewed it as a threat that could lead to despotism if unchecked.
Throughout history, governments and their citizens have struggled with balancing freedom and order. The fear of tyranny is a driving force in the creation and maintenance of democracies. In this way, the anti-tyranny argument remains relevant, showing the importance of vigilant governance and the rule of law in preserving the liberties of a republic.