Question

Read the passage below and answer the following question.

As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch.

In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story.

Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.

The author of this passage would be most likely to agree that:

a. kids should not watch television or movies at until they are in their teens.
b. government rating system should have more levels to make them more useful.
c. It is never appropriate to prevent any human being from watching any show or movie.
d. Another parent should have the right to let her own kids watch extremely violent movies.

Answer 1

The author of the passage would likely agree that parents should use personalized judgment to determine the appropriateness of movies for their children, due to the unique maturity of each child.

Step-by-step explanation:

The author of the passage expresses concern over the movie rating systems like those implemented by the MPAA, citing that they do not adequately reflect individual children's maturity or parents’ personal standards. The author would most likely agree with the idea that parents should have the discretion to judge the appropriateness of a movie for their own children. This is because the author values parental knowledge of their own child’s maturity over standardized ratings when deciding what content is suitable for them to watch.

The passage suggests that the author believes in tailored judgement based on individual children's readiness rather than strictly adhering to the levels of movie ratings or television ratings. The use of ratings as a tool, rather than an absolute measure, aligns with the author’s view, which likely supports the notion that each parent should have the right to decide what is too violent or inappropriate for their own children.