Final answer:
The precedence of social harmony over truth in society is a matter of philosophical debate, with power dynamics often dictating the resolution of conflicts. Historical shifts in ideology show changing attitudes towards truth, and in postmodern society, relativism and practical consequences are influential. The tension between truth and social harmony encapsulates key moral and societal dilemmas.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks what takes precedence in society: social harmony or truth. This is a complex issue, reflecting deep philosophical debates about the nature of truth, the role of government, and philosophical pragmatism. Conflicts between individual wants and societal needs are moderated by the government, but the resolution often depends on which group holds the most power. The pragmatic view suggests that societal norms usually dictate resolutions to conflicts, privileging the group in power, leading to an alignment where knowledge and power are seen as interchangeable.
Historically, societies have grappled with the question of how to live a good life. Shifts in ideology—from obedience to the gods or a deity to postmodern relativism—reflect changing attitudes toward truth and justice. Today, there is cynicism around the concept of absolute truth, resulting in a popularity of relativism and ideas that regard truth as useful or consequential rather than objective and factual.
The quest for a 'good life' intrinsically creates a balance between social ideologies—whether one believes in social justice as a construct or a reality. Within this framework, instances arise where telling the truth could lead to harm, posing a moral dilemma about whether to adhere to the principle of honesty or protect from harm. These examples illustrate the ongoing tension and negotiation between truth and social harmony in our societies.