Final answer:
Compromise in negotiations, such as those about greenhouse gas emissions, leads to concessions where each party agrees on partially satisfactory terms. This occurs when teams have shared goals but differ on specifics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept described in the student's question relates to compromise and negotiation in a setting involving multiple parties with differing goals, such as in international relations or political bargaining. When team members from different countries negotiate, disagreements may arise, which can lead to side conversations.
These side conversations often result in concessions, as the parties look to reach a consensus or agreement. In political negotiations, the participants may hold different objectives but agree on overarching goals, creating a conducive environment for compromise. For instance, if countries are negotiating on greenhouse gas emissions, there may be varied opinions on the specifics, leading to a compromise where all parties get part of what they want, though not entirely.
There are typically three outcomes in political bargaining: no agreement, resulting in the status quo; a successful compromise where each party gets a portion of their demands; or, occasionally, a decisive win for one party. Compromises are often seen positively because they allow participants to avoid a stalemate and instead agree on solutions that are partially satisfactory to all involved.