Final answer:
The statement that best reflects the outcome of the Secure Fence Act is that it aimed to limit undocumented immigration but had limited impact. Increased border security and a physical barrier along certain parts did not fully prevent undocumented crossings and led to other issues.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Secure Fence Act was enacted in 2006 with the aim to limit the number of undocumented immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. The Act authorized the construction of a fence along certain stretches of the border and additional security enhancements. Describing the outcome of this Act can be complex, but based on the information available, it seems that while it might have succeeded in some areas, overall, the effect was limited.
Considering the facts, it appears that while border security was indeed increased in some sectors, this did not entirely prevent the entry of undocumented immigrants. Moreover, the increase in border security and the building of a physical barrier have created unintended consequences, such as making the process more dangerous by pushing crossings to more remote and perilous areas. The act ignited widespread protests and criticism from different sectors in society, including students, local businesses, humanitarian groups, and environmentalists.
Thus, the statement that best describes the outcome of the Secure Fence Act is: 'Its goal was to limit the number of undocumented immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, but it ultimately had little influence.' This reflects the overall consensus that while some aspects of border control were strengthened, the broader impact on illegal immigration was not as significant as intended.