Final Answer:
The relationship between two of the article's central ideas is D) The Titanic was built to withstand almost any kind of naval disaster. Its tragic end can be fully attributed to human error and lack of oversight.
Step-by-step explanation:
The central ideas in option D suggest that the Titanic was constructed with the intention of being highly resilient to naval disasters, indicating a high level of engineering and safety measures. However, the tragic sinking of the ship is attributed not to inherent design flaws but rather to human errors and a lack of oversight. This relationship between the ship's robust design and its ultimate fate underscores the role of human factors in complex systems.
The construction of the Titanic was indeed a testament to naval engineering prowess, as indicated in option A. However, the article's central idea in option D introduces the notion that the ship's structural integrity alone was not sufficient to prevent its sinking. The relationship between these ideas highlights the nuanced nature of disasters, emphasizing the importance of both advanced engineering and effective human decision-making in ensuring the safety of complex systems.
In summary, the relationship between the central ideas in option D implies a synergy between advanced engineering (the Titanic's construction) and human factors (errors and oversight) in determining the fate of the ship. This understanding encourages a more comprehensive analysis of historical events, recognizing the interplay between technology and human actions in shaping outcomes.Therefore the correct option is D) The Titanic was built to withstand almost any kind of naval disaster. Its tragic end can be fully attributed to human error and lack of oversight.