Final answer:
It is false to claim that inhibiting the use of native language aids English proficiency. Research and historical evidence support the benefits of bilingual education and the value of linguistic diversity in learning, cultural identity, and professional success.
Step-by-step explanation:
Inhibiting students' use of their native language is counterproductive to developing proficiency in English. This statement is false. Research by Johns Hopkins University has shown that students who are taught in both their native tongue and English make better progress than those taught only in English. Additionally, historical examples and advocacy for language rights warn against the negative consequences of suppressing native languages in educational settings.
Advocating for bilingual education not only values the cultural and linguistic backgrounds of students but also provides them with the cognitive and social benefits of being multilingual. In contrast, the forced assimilation practices of the past have demonstrated the cultural loss and negative impact on indigenous and immigrant communities when their languages are prohibited.
The importance of embracing linguistic diversity is further underscored by the Conference on College Composition and Communication's adoption of "Students' Right to Their Own Language," acknowledging the value of different dialects and the cultural significance of language. It is also supported by the reality that most U.S. immigrants eventually become fluent in English without abandoning their native tongues, which contributes to their professional success and community service, as illustrated by Lucy Alvarez's story.
Ultimately, supporting multiple languages in education aligns with best practices that foster a more equitable, culturally responsible, and effective learning environment, while also contributing to the economic and social fabric of the nation.