Final answer:
A customer seeking to recover damages from TPB, LLC might use the veil-piercing strategy to hold the owners personally liable if the LLC's corporate protections were inappropriately used. Self-dealing and derivative lawsuits are not relevant strategies in this context. 'Go pound sand' is not a valid legal term.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a customer has suffered damages and is seeking to recover from TPB, LLC, the most appropriate legal strategy would likely be veil piercing (also known as piercing the corporate veil). This legal action challenges the protection that the limited liability company (LLC) structure typically provides to its owners (in this case, Ricky and Julian). If the court finds that the LLC was just an alter-ego of the owners, that they commingled personal and business assets, failed to follow corporate formalities, or engaged in fraudulent behavior, it might allow the customer to hold Ricky and Julian personally liable for the damages.
Self-dealing refers to a situation where the managers or directors of a company may have participated in transactions that benefit themselves at the company’s expense. A derivative lawsuit is a legal action brought by a shareholder on behalf of the corporation against its leaders for wrongdoing. 'Go pound sand' is an informal phrase and not a legal strategy. Considering that a customer is seeking recovery for damages, options 2 and 3 would not be relevant, and option 4 is not applicable in a legal context.