Final answer:
True statements include the importance of ethical sensitivity beyond technical competence and considerable pressures to bend rules in the workplace. Ethical decision-making can be complicated by multiple pressures, and the absence of a universal ethical system requires reliance on professional codes and personal values.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the four statements provided, the following are true:
- Technical competence is not enough when encountering ethical decisions.
- The pressures to bend the rules, to play the game, to just ignore it can be considerable.
These statements reflect the complexity inherent in ethical decision-making in a business context. Technical competence is essential, but it must be complemented by ethical sensitivity to navigate the often-competing demands of different stakeholders, as well as personal and corporate responsibility. Ethical pressures in the workplace may come from time constraints, job demands, client expectations, personal values, and the influence of peers. These pressures can complicate the process of ethical sensitivity and the consideration of alternatives, contrary to the stated third false statement. Moreover, the lack of a universal ethical system, as suggested by the fourth statement, can indeed present challenges, but it does not necessarily make decisions easier; instead, it may require individuals to rely on a blend of principles from competing moral theories to reach a resolution that aligns with their professional codes and personal values.
Codes of ethics, such as the Software Engineering Code of Ethics provided by the IEEE-CS, help establish a guideline for professionals to follow. However, as individuals encounter real-world situations that test their values, such as ethical dilemmas and emerging technologies, the adherence to these codes becomes a complex interplay of various moral considerations.