Final answer:
A majority vote will decide if the $600 per person tax is enacted, with townspeople theoretically willing to spend up to $3 million for its passage, while factory owners might spend up to $2 million to prevent it, reflecting the financial stakes involved in political campaigns.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the tax cost of this proposed project is $600 per person, a majority vote will determine whether the tax is implemented or not. In the provided scenario, there are 10,000 townspeople each standing to benefit by $300 if the tax passes. T
Therefore, collectively, they should be willing to spend up to $3 million to ensure the tax's passage, as they each stand to receive a benefit that outweighs their individual tax cost.
On the other hand, the two factory owners each stand to lose $1 million if the tax passes, suggesting that they should be willing to spend up to that amount to prevent the tax from passing. This situation reflects a real-world decision-making scenario where the stakes of the taxation effect on various groups lead to political and financial campaigning for or against the tax measure.
Likewise, a random poll of registered voters indicated 65% would vote for the amendment, suggesting a likely passage, but real-world variables like voter turnout and campaign efforts can affect the actual outcome.