Final answer:
In a limited government, citizens have more freedoms and rights protected by laws and constitutions, whereas in an unlimited government these protections are not guaranteed and freedoms can be severely restricted.
Step-by-step explanation:
Citizens generally have more freedoms and rights in a limited form of government compared to an unlimited government. In a limited government, the rights of citizens are protected by a constitution or a bill of rights which establishes the limits and rules that the government must follow. By contrast, in an unlimited government, an individual's natural rights are not guaranteed, and the concentration of power can lead to fewer freedoms and greater restrictions on people's lives.
Democracies, which are examples of limited governments, ensure basic rights for their citizens, like the right to organize political parties, hold elections, enjoy freedom of speech, press, and assembly, and to be protected against unlawful imprisonment. The U.S. Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, forms the bedrock of such protections, guaranteeing certain rights and liberties to all persons within its jurisdiction, not just citizens or adults.
Civil liberties, as freedoms from government interference, are different from civil rights, which are entitlements that governments protect for groups facing discrimination. The essential human rights include both civil liberties and civil rights, with the former focusing on individual freedoms and the latter on the rights of groups to do certain activities, like voting.