Final answer:
The statement provided is false; the Supreme Court did not rule that labor disputes were easily resolved under the Norris-LaGuardia Act with injunctions. Instead, the act restricted such injunctions, supporting workers' rights to organize and engage in collective bargaining.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the Supreme Court ruled in the late 1930s that labor disputes were covered under the Norris-LaGuardia Act and that injunctions could easily be obtained is false. The Norris-LaGuardia Act, in fact, restricted the issuance of court injunctions in labor disputes. The act aimed to protect workers' rights to organize and engage in collective bargaining. Important legislations like the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, further supported these rights by creating the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to arbitrate disputes and reinforcing the concept of collective bargaining. It was through cases such as NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Steel that the Supreme Court upheld these laws, expanding the government's role in labor relations and steering away from issuing labor dispute injunctions.