Final answer:
Critics of student-centered curricula believe they do not fit all educational needs and potentially disregard foundational knowledge, with the larger educational debate focusing on traditional versus student-centered teaching approaches.
Step-by-step explanation:
Critics of the student-centered curriculum maintain that it has far more negative than positive aspects, arguing that a "one size fits all" concept does not apply to education. These critics assert that while such curricula aim to teach problem solving abilities and learning skills, they may fall short in ensuring that all students receive the foundational knowledge necessary for future success. This is part of a broader debate in education, where one side emphasizes traditional teaching and rote memorization, while the other promotes a student-centered approach that fosters independence and critical thinking. Compounded by issues such as "teaching to the test", due to policies such as No Child Left Behind, and socio-economic disparities exacerbated by local property tax-based funding, the student-centered curriculum is under scrutiny for potentially neglecting the needs of diverse student populations and reinforcing inequalities.