Final answer:
In a pure market economy, the CEO of a major corporation would benefit the most, while an unemployed engineer would benefit the least.
Step-by-step explanation:
A pure market economy is an economic system where decisions about production, distribution, and pricing are made based on supply and demand, with minimal government intervention. In this type of economy, the CEO of a major corporation would likely benefit the most, as they would have the freedom to make decisions and allocate resources in a way that maximizes profits. On the other hand, an unemployed engineer would benefit the least in a pure market economy, as they would be reliant on finding employment in a competitive labor market. Without job security or government assistance, an unemployed engineer may struggle to find stable employment and income.
While a stock broker and a caterer may also face challenges in a purely market-driven economy, they could potentially adapt and find opportunities. A stock broker could navigate the financial market and take advantage of market fluctuations, while a caterer could adjust their services to cater to changing consumer demands.
In summary, a pure market economy would benefit the CEO of a major corporation the most and the unemployed engineer the least.