Final answer:
The option that is not a benefit of teams in the healthcare environment is reducing marketing costs for resource recruitment. Teams are typically associated with benefits such as improving patient care, managing change effectively, and enhancing work-related loyalty, not with the costs associated with marketing or recruitment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which of the following is not a benefit of teams in the healthcare environment. Reducing marketing costs for resource recruitment does not seem to align directly with the typical benefits of healthcare teams, such as constructing a patient care focus, facilitating change management, and increasing loyalty to work-related goals. Teams in healthcare are typically known to improve patient outcomes, foster a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, and enhance communication among healthcare professionals, which in turn can boost productivity and lead to greater job satisfaction. Additionally, the team halo effect can sometimes make teams appear to work better than they actually do. The goals of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, included providing access to affordable health insurance, requiring everyone in the United States to acquire some form of health insurance, and lowering the costs of healthcare, but not specifically increasing employment in the healthcare industry. The shift from a fee-for-service model to an emphasis on health maintenance organizations (HMOs) represents a significant change in healthcare provision, where providers have an incentive to limit services to reduce the moral hazard problem. When considering event planning in health settings, partnering with organizations can expand outreach, promote diversity among attendees, and create more cost-effective results. Finally, teams do not inherently deliver greater productivity; the efficacy of team structures is an active area of research.