Final answer:
The false statements about charging by conduction pertain to misunderstandings of how charged materials interact, especially in the case of conductors where electrons are transferred and do not accumulate as they would on insulating materials.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which of the provided statements about charging by conduction is FALSE. After analyzing the options, we can determine the correct answer.
The first statement (a) is indeed false, as when you rub a material such as rabbit fur against another material, such as human skin or metal, electrons are transferred, resulting in opposite charges on the materials; additionally, in the case of a conductor like a metal pipe, electrons won't accumulate on it but rather move through the conductor to the experimenter and potentially the Earth if grounded.
Statement (b) describes charging by contact accurately by contrasting it with charging by friction; hence, it is not false.
Statement (c) is true since a negatively charged object will remove electrons from a neutral one upon contact, and a positively charged object will transfer electrons to the neutral object, leading to similar charges on both objects.
Lastly, statement (d) accurately describes charging by friction, where rubbing two different materials together causes electrons to move from one material to the other due to differences in electron affinity, so it is also true.