Final answer:
The question pertains to the number of people contacted for a political poll and the related concepts of polling accuracy and methodologies. It cites historical instances of polling errors and changes in polling methods, such as random-digit-dialing, to include a broader demographic.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems to be asking for information on the number of people reached or contacted for a political poll, in relation to the number of people who responded affirmatively for a given candidate. It touches upon the subject of polling methodologies and the reliability of such polls in predicting the outcome of elections. An infamous example of polling error is the 1936 presidential election prediction, where a magazine incorrectly predicted a large margin victory for the Republican candidate due to a non-representative sample. Polling accuracy can be affected by a number of factors, including the methods by which respondents are contacted and social pressures causing respondents to give misleading answers, such as in the case of the 'Bradley effect.' Today, most polling is done over the phone or the Internet with methods such as random-digit-dialing (RDD) to include a wider range of respondents, including those with unlisted and cellular numbers.