Final answer:
The claim that frequency is inversely proportional to distance away from OriT is false; frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength and directly proportional to energy.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that frequency is inversely proportional to distance away from OriT is false. In physics, particularly in the study of waves and optics, frequency is known to be inversely proportional to wavelength and directly proportional to energy. This means that as frequency increases, the wavelength of the wave decreases, and the energy of the wave increases. This relationship holds true for electromagnetic radiation, and the effect of frequency on the kinetic energy of ejected electrons is described by the photoelectric effect, where higher frequencies (above a particular threshold) can transfer additional energy into the kinetic energy of the electrons.
When considering the Doppler effect, which describes the change in frequency or wavelength of a wave in relation to an observer who is moving relative to the wave source, an observer moving towards the source will perceive a higher frequency, and an observer moving away will perceive a lower frequency. The relative motion between the source and the observer directly affects the observed frequency, but this is not described as an inverse relation to distance; rather, it is a dynamic interaction caused by motion.