Final answer:
Misrepresentation in an ad suggests an intent to mislead but is not enough on its own to prove intent to induce reliance. The FTC allows some exaggeration in ads; outright false claims are prohibited. The principle of caveat emptor highlights consumer responsibility.
so the statement is false
Step-by-step explanation:
False. Misrepresentation in an ad might suggest an intent to mislead consumers, but it is not sufficient to automatically prove an intent to induce the reliance of anyone who may use the product.
While the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulates advertising to prevent outright untruthful "facts," advertisements can still contain exaggerated or ambiguous language and images that aren't actually false. This aligns with the principle of caveat emptor, which means "let the buyer beware." Therefore, intent must be proven beyond simply showing misrepresentation in the ad.
correct option is false.