94.4k views
3 votes
Personal jurisdiction can be obtained in an in-state court over an out-of-state defendant even if the defendant has no connection with the court's state.

a. True
b. False

User Artisan
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Personal jurisdiction cannot be obtained over an out-of-state defendant with no connection to the court's state. The statement is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

In general, personal jurisdiction can be obtained in an in-state court over an out-of-state defendant even if the defendant has no connection with the court's state. This is known as 'specific jurisdiction.'

However, there are certain requirements that need to be met before a court can exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.

These requirements include demonstrating that the defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the state and that the exercise of jurisdiction is reasonable and fair based on these contacts.

For example, if an out-of-state defendant purposefully directed activities towards the forum state, such as selling products to residents of that state, they may be subject to personal jurisdiction in that state.

Therefore, the statement is false. Personal jurisdiction cannot be obtained over an out-of-state defendant if they have no connection with the court's state.

User Jerry Stratton
by
7.5k points