Answer 'a' strongly supports the effectiveness of peaceful resistance in times of crisis.
How to explain
It emphasizes the imperative for leaders to confront violent forces through deliberate actions, advocating for peaceful protests and negotiations as the primary means to achieve sustainable resolutions.
This choice aligns with historical examples like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., illustrating the potency of nonviolent methods in initiating societal transformation.
The emphasis on peaceful means amid tumultuous periods not only addresses immediate conflicts but also lays the groundwork for long-term stability and societal change, advocating for a strategic, moral, and impactful approach to resolving crises through nonviolent resistance.
The Complete Question
Title: The Efficacy of Peaceful Resistance in Times of Crisis
In times of upheaval and turmoil, leaders face a moral dilemma: whether to confront violence with further force or to opt for peaceful resistance. The strategies chosen during such moments can shape the course of history. Amidst these choices, the use of nonviolent methods, as advocated by leaders and social reformers, proves to be a pivotal approach. The essay will explore the significance of peaceful resistance and its effectiveness in resolving crises.
Leadership in times of turmoil necessitates astute decision-making. Option 'a' asserts the compelling need for leaders to counter violent forces through deliberate, non-violent actions. The phrase, "sustainable resolution," emphasizes the long-term benefits of peaceful protests and negotiations. History has celebrated those who, like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., advocated for peaceful means to achieve societal transformation.