Final answer:
Whether Charlotte's calculations make sense cannot be determined without additional context. A reasonable physics calculation should include correct methodology, transparent work, and match theoretical expectations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The provided information suggests a focus on checking the reasonableness of an answer in a physics problem. To determine if Charlotte's calculations make sense, we would need to evaluate her methodology, her work's transparency, and the final outcome compared to a theoretical model or expected results.
Checking for reasonableness includes confirming that the signs, magnitude, and units of the answer are correct. In this case, simply having the correct answer (option c) does not necessarily mean Charlotte's calculations make sense if she did not follow the correct steps (option a), show her work (option b), or if there is insufficient information to assess her work (option d).
For example, in physics, when determining a car's final velocity, you would need to ensure your calculations account for consistent units (like meters per second) and that the magnitude and direction of the velocity make sense in the context of the problem. Showing each step explicitly helps in verifying that the physical laws and equations have been applied correctly.
Without more context, it is difficult to definitively say whether Charlotte's calculations make sense. A reasonable and detailed explanation typically includes a demonstration of the steps taken, checks against relevant physical principles, and a comparison to the theoretical distribution or expected results.