55,284 views
6 votes
6 votes
Question 3

You've researched and analyzed. Now it's time to present your findings! Compose a three-paragraph newspaper article
about the development. Include and expand upon your responses to the questions in questions 1 and 2. Be sure to use
quotes from your sources and cite them properly. Make sure your article uses correct spelling and grammar, topic
statements, an introduction, a conclusion, and smooth transitions.
(About Pluto)

User Szymon Roziewski
by
2.7k points

1 Answer

11 votes
11 votes

Final answer:

The article discusses new astronomical research that brings into question Pluto's status as a dwarf planet, depicting its complex geology and contrasting this with non-scholarly responses. The scientific evidence supports re-examining Pluto's classification, amending the initial thesis to reflect these findings.

Step-by-step explanation:

Rediscovering Our Heavenly Neighbor: Pluto

In a remarkable turn of events, astronomers have recently unearthed new facts about Pluto, questioning its assigned status as a dwarf planet. The investigation began with the quest to understand more about this beloved former planet, taking us from dusty textbooks to the cutting edge of space science. The initial thesis statement suggested that Pluto might possess characteristics that align it closer to planetary status than previously thought.

The research encompassed a variety of scholarly articles, shedding light on the composition and behavior of Pluto's heart-shaped glacier, known as Sputnik Planitia. One poignant quote from a member of the New Horizons team, Dr. Alan Stern, highlights the complexity of this celestial body, "Pluto has blue skies, red snow, mountains as high as the Rockies, wide smooth plains, gushing geysers, and it snows—but the snow on Pluto, which is red, is like the snow in high mountains on Earth." These findings suggest a world full of geological activity, contrary to the static image held since Pluto’s demotion in 2006. The debate is renewed: is Pluto more planet-like than we give it credit for?

The non-scholarly perception of Pluto still echoes feelings of disenchantment after its demotion, encompassing a range of emotional responses from the public. However, the scientific evidence amassed tells a different story. Upon scrutinizing the scholarly literature, I found that the new data indeed supports a more complex view of Pluto that could challenge its current classification. Therefore, while my initial thesis remains partially sustained, amendments are necessary to acknowledge the growing body of scientific knowledge suggesting Pluto's reclassification might need to be reconsidered. This discovery not only enchants the public sentiment but also invites the scientific community to re-examine the criteria for planethood.

User Hxysayhi
by
2.9k points