Final answer:
Without proper context, it is not possible to ascertain the veracity of the statement regarding Bullock's demand to Piedras. The statement is disconnected from the provided historical exercises, which cover various events and facts from American and colonial history.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question involves the history of early America and the conflicts between settlers, colonial leaders, and Indigenous peoples. Bullock's demand for Piedras to rescind his order is related to maintaining settlers' rights to keep their arms and organize a militia, which is a matter of historical record. However, without additional context or a specific reference to a historical event, we can't definitively say whether the statement is true or false, as the question seems to be disconnected from the provided exercises, which involve various historical facts and events.
For example, the Proclamation of 1763 was indeed a response to Pontiac's War, which is marked as true according to exercise 7.1.2. Not all of the tribes in the Iroquois Confederacy maintained neutrality during the Revolutionary War, as indicated by the answer being false in exercise 8.3.5 and repeated in exercise 5.2.3. The question of whether the Loyalists were protected and well-treated after the signing of a treaty can be complex, and the provided exercise 8.4.3 suggests it is false, indicating mistreatment or negative repercussions for the Loyalists.
Ultimately, given the fragmented nature of the information and the lack of clarity in the question, it's not possible to provide a definite answer as to whether Bullock's demand to Piedras is accurate without additional historical context.