Final answer:
The question about Trevor not being punished for being naughty is addressed by discussing different historical contexts where punishments were administered.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context of the question about Trevor not being punished for being naughty, the excerpts provided talk about different situations and contexts where punishments were administered in history.
For example, in the first excerpt, the narrator wonders why he wasn't punished more severely for defending himself against a white man. The explanation given is that the reputation of the overseer was at stake, and sending a young boy like the narrator to be publicly whipped might have tarnished that reputation.
In the second excerpt, it discusses how punishments were administered by a schoolteacher, who showed a sense of justice by being more lenient with weaker students but imposing double the punishment on those who were stronger or more defiant.
The third excerpt provides a broader historical context where the category of birth and social roles had real effects on punishments. Different social groups received different sentences for the same crime, and factors such as age, sex, and relationship to the victim were considered in determining punishments.