Final answer:
The correct answer is A) True. The conclusion of a paper should summarize and reflect upon the main points covered in the body without adding new details. It should reaffirm the thesis, synthesize the main arguments, and may offer broader implications, leaving the reader with a lasting impression.
Step-by-step explanation:
Regarding the statement "New details should not be put in the conclusion. The conclusion should reflect on what was written in the body and summarize the main points," the correct answer is A) True. A conclusion in an essay or a paper should indeed reflect upon the main points discussed in the body but not introduce completely new arguments or details. Rather, the conclusion segment should serve as a coherent endpoint that reasserts the thesis in light of the evidence provided, summarizes the main points, and potentially suggests broader implications or applications of the argument, leaving the reader with a final thought to ponder.
The conclusion is a crucial element where the writer has the opportunity to make a good final impression and show why their response to the subject matter is valid and significant. The essence here is to avoid presenting new evidence that wasn't supported in the body of the text, as that risks leaving the reader with unfounded assertions. However, this doesn't mean the conclusion should merely be a mechanical restatement of the thesis; it needs to synthesize the points made and demonstrate how they come together to support the central argument.
Overall, it's important to remember that the conclusion should clearly tie up the main points without adding significant new material. The aim is to provide closure and underline the significance of the paper's argument, possibly pointing to implications without making new claims. Suggestions for further thought or implications of the argument are acceptable if they are presented as non-definitive and naturally arise from the preceding discussion within the paper.