Final answer:
The experiences of Midwestern migrant farmers and Mexican migrant farmers share similarities in facing unfairness and injustice, but differ in their drivers for migration - changes in technology and environmental conditions in the Midwest vs. economic factors and labor shortages for Mexican farmers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The experiences of Midwestern migrant farmers and Mexican migrant farmers share some similarities but also have significant differences.
One similarity is that both groups of farmers faced unfairness and injustice in the market. They had to negotiate the market value of their labor and products, often against large countries or corporations. This unfairness and injustice led to internal migration from rural areas into urban zones for both groups.
However, there are also notable differences. Midwestern migrant farmers were primarily driven by changes in farm technology and environmental conditions. The Homestead Act of 1862 opened up parts of the Midwest for agriculture, attracting farmers with the promise of land. On the other hand, Mexican migrant farmers were predominantly driven by economic factors and labor shortages. They crossed the border into the United States to work in the fields, particularly during times of emergency labor shortages like during World War II.