Final answer:
The San Diegan's commute time was 7.7 minutes shorter than the New Yorker's commute time. Relative to their respective cities, the San Diegan had the shorter commute.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine how much shorter the San Diegan's commute time was compared to the New Yorker's commute time, we subtract the San Diegan's commute time from the New Yorker's commute time:
25.4 - 17.7 = 7.7 minutes
Therefore, the San Diegan's commute time was 7.7 minutes shorter than the New Yorker's commute time.
In order to determine who had the shorter commute relative to the city, we compare each person's commute time to the mean commute time for their respective city.
For the New Yorker:
(25.4 - 34.3) / 8.86 = -1.01 (z-score)
For the San Diegan:
(17.7 - 23.5) / 6.41 = -0.91 (z-score)
Since both z-scores are negative, this indicates that both the New Yorker and the San Diegan have commute times below the mean for their respective cities.
However, the San Diegan's z-score (-0.91) is closer to 0 than the New Yorker's z-score (-1.01), indicating that the San Diegan's commute time is relatively closer to the mean commute time for San Diego compared to the New Yorker's commute time to the mean commute time for New York City.
Therefore, relative to their respective cities, the San Diegan had the shorter commute.