Final answer:
The author's use of loaded language in arguing that space exploration needs a human touch can strongly sway the reader's emotions, potentially aligning them with the author's views. The effectiveness of such persuasion depends on individual dispositions and reliance on logical arguments versus emotional appeals. Rhetorical strategies can significantly influence educational discussions and viewpoints.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author's argument is that space exploration requires a human touch, which suggests a personal or human element is essential for the endeavor. The loaded language in the argument can significantly affect the reader by invoking emotional responses or connotations that go beyond the literal meaning of the words. This use of language can serve to persuade by engaging the reader's emotions and aligning them with the author's perspective.
In terms of persuasion, whether the loaded language convinces you might depend on your personal beliefs about space exploration and the value of human involvement. For some, the emotional appeal might strengthen their agreement with the author's position. For others, a decision would rest more on logical arguments and facts, such as the challenges outlined in discussions about finite resources on Earth, human innovation, and the possible limitations of our knowledge about the laws of physics.
The argument that appeals to the reader's emotions, as seen in Peterson's calls for solidarity concerning the future of language learning, shows how rhetoric can be used to persuade. Persuasion through rhetoric in educational texts is critical in shaping viewpoints and sparking discussions on important issues.