192k views
4 votes
Which best describes why a scientist would ask a different question than this one? The question asks about subjective personal preferences regarding energy.

A) Scientists aim to gather objective data and measurements in their research.
B) This question is too broad in scope and covers a wide range of situations.
C) Scientists focus on studying the future and finding innovative solutions to changing needs.
D) The question is focused on the future and seeking new answers to evolving requirements.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

A scientist would ask a different question to focus on objective and empirical data, as subjective preferences about energy can't be consistently measured in scientific research.

Step-by-step explanation:

Scientists tend to ask questions that can be tested and verified through empirical evidence, focusing on objective data. Preferences about energy would lead to subjective answers, which is why a scientist might rephrase the question to allow for objective analysis.

The question mentioned seeks personal opinions, which are subjective in nature. In science, questions need to be framed to gather objective data that is empirically grounded and can withstand repetitive observation and testing. Subjective preferences can't be consistently measured, making them less useful for scientific inquiry. Researchers aim for a precise type of question that can yield qualitative or quantitative data directly related to the hypothesis being tested.

Thus, a scientist may opt to design a study that objectively measures certain aspects of energy use or preferences by collecting quantifiable data. This might mean asking about energy consumption patterns or the factors that influence the selection of energy sources, which would provide objectivity and solid evidence instead of personal opinions.

User Klatschen
by
7.8k points