Question

Discuss the pros and cons of using different potential raters to appraise a person's performance.

A) Provides diverse perspectives, potential bias
B) Ensures consistency, limited viewpoints
C) Promotes fairness, time-consuming
D) Increases accuracy, conflicts of interest

Answer 1

Using different potential raters to appraise a person's performance has pros such as providing diverse perspectives and increasing accuracy, but it also has cons such as potential bias and conflicts of interest.

Step-by-step explanation:

Using different potential raters to appraise a person's performance has both pros and cons.

Here are the main advantages and disadvantages:

1. Provides diverse perspectives: When different potential raters assess a person's performance, it brings in various viewpoints, which can provide a more comprehensive evaluation. However, this can also introduce potential bias if the raters have conflicting opinions.
2. Ensures consistency: Using the same set of raters for all employees ensures a consistent evaluation process. However, it may limit the range of viewpoints and perspectives considered.
3. Promotes fairness: Involving multiple raters can promote fairness by minimizing the influence of individual biases. However, it can be time-consuming to collect and consolidate evaluations from different raters.
4. Increases accuracy: Having multiple raters can help increase the accuracy of performance appraisals by reducing the impact of individual biases. However, conflicts of interest can arise if the raters have personal or professional relationships with the person being appraised.