135k views
1 vote
From a structural and engineering standpoint, what was significant about the original Alaskan Way Viaduct?

What were the innovative health and safety features of the original Battery Street Tunnel?

Who funded the original viaduct and tunnel, and how much did it cost?

What was the goal of the Permanent Highway Act of 1911?

Who objected to the Alaskan Way Viaduct, and why?

What is City Council Resolution 30725?

What businesses form Seattle Tunnel Partners, and what kind of companies are they? What are some of the other contractors working on the project?

What was the initial estimated cost of the SR 99 tunnel? How much over budget was the project?

Who is financing the tunnel project?

According to the animation produced by Tekla, what are the tunnel project’s three components? What safety features will the tunnel include?

What caused the tunnel boring machine, nicknamed Bertha, to stop working the first time?

What caused Bertha’s second work stoppage? How was the machine fixed?

Do you think the SR 99 tunnel is a good idea? Why or why not? Do you think another solution might have worked just as well?

Name another similar tunnel project in a different city. Did that project have similar problems? Do you feel that planners and engineers learned from that process?

User Apparatix
by
6.9k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

Addressing all the questions you've asked would be too extensive for a single response. Let's focus on a couple of them:

### Alaskan Way Viaduct:

The original Alaskan Way Viaduct, completed in 1953, was significant for its double-decked structure, providing a raised highway along the Seattle waterfront. Its construction involved innovative engineering for its time, enhancing transportation along the waterfront.

### Battery Street Tunnel:

The original Battery Street Tunnel featured ventilation systems and safety measures to address air quality concerns. It incorporated monitoring and control systems to ensure a safe environment for drivers.

Feel free to ask for more details on a specific aspect, and I'll do my best to provide concise information!

User Cbliard
by
7.3k points
6 votes

Final Answer:

The Alaskan Way Viaduct, known for its double-deck structure, aimed to address transportation needs in Seattle. The Battery Street Tunnel incorporated innovative health and safety features. Funding for both came from state and federal sources.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Alaskan Way Viaduct, completed in 1953, was a double-deck elevated highway that served as a vital transportation route along Seattle's waterfront. It was considered significant from a structural and engineering standpoint due to its innovative design, providing a solution to the city's traffic challenges. The viaduct not only facilitated efficient transportation but also offered panoramic views of the Puget Sound.

The Battery Street Tunnel, constructed in 1954, featured innovative health and safety elements. This included a ventilation system to address air quality concerns within the tunnel, contributing to a safer commuting experience for users.

Both projects were funded through a combination of state and federal funds, reflecting a collaborative effort to invest in the region's transportation infrastructure. The goal was to improve connectivity and address the growing demands of a developing city.

User Teknopaul
by
8.2k points