Final answer:
Opinion B that 'e-learning is just as good as the classroom' has more empirical support, as studies indicate that with proper execution and student engagement, e-learning can be as effective as traditional learning environments. Both opinions require factual evidence to be strongly supported.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the statement, "Which opinion has strong support? A. E-learning is just a way for colleges to make more money. B. E-learning is just as good as the classroom. C. Neither opinion is well supported.", it's essential to look at the evidence behind each opinion. Opinion A may be viewed critically in light of the fact that e-learning can actually provide cost-saving opportunities for colleges and students, whereas Opinion B is backed by studies showing that if executed correctly, e-learning can be equally effective as traditional classroom settings due to the presence of student responsibility and varied attentive methods. However, the strength of these supports may vary based on different studies and contexts.
Both sides of the argument would need to present factual evidence to bolster their claims. For instance, regarding Opinion A, it's important to consider that schools can potentially leverage e-learning to enroll more students at a lower cost compared to traditional classes, which could be interpreted as a profit-driven motive. Conversely, when examining Opinion B, the effectiveness of e-learning would rely heavily on design, execution, and the extent to which students are engaged and supported.
Therefore, the most compelling support can usually be linked to solid empirical evidence, such as success rates, student satisfaction, costs, and the quality of learning outcomes. It's critical to consider both sides of the debate and examine the evidence to determine which opinion, if either, is better supported.