Final answer:
Sam did better on the exam than Wallace because his score of -8 is greater than Wallace's score of -10, indicating that Sam has a less negative, and therefore higher, score.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the situation described, we must compare two negative numbers to determine who performed better on the practice exam, which is similar to comparing which z-score indicates a better position in relation to a mean score. For scoring, such as on exams or GPA, higher values are indicative of better performance. Therefore, a less negative score means better performance.
Comparing Sam's score of -8 to Wallace's score of -10, we can conclude that:
- Sam did better than Wallace because -8 is greater than -10.
- Therefore, Option 1 is the correct comparison: Sam did better on the exam than Wallace because -8 > -10.
This reasoning aligns with how we interpret z-scores, where a z-score that is less negative is closer to the mean and thus indicates better performance relative to others.