60.3k views
0 votes
Which of the following represents an accurate distinction between arguing and dialoguing?

a) Arguing involves respectful communication, while dialoguing does not.
b) Arguing aims to find common ground, while dialoguing emphasizes disagreement.
c) Arguing often leads to collaboration, while dialoguing tends to create conflict.
d) Arguing focuses on persuading, while dialoguing emphasizes understanding.

User Fela
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The correct distinction between arguing and dialoguing is that arguing focuses on persuading others to support a certain viewpoint, whereas dialoguing is about reaching understanding and considering different perspectives without the need to persuade. The correct option is option D.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question you've asked concerns the distinction between arguing and dialoguing. The correct option from the choices provided that accurately provides this distinction is option d) Arguing focuses on persuading, while dialoguing emphasizes understanding. Arguing is typically about presenting a set of reasons or evidence to persuade others to support a certain viewpoint. It's a form of communication often employed to debate and convince others that one's position is valid.

On the other hand, dialoguing is about exchanging ideas with the aim of reaching a deeper comprehension and is not necessarily about persuading or winning an argument but rather about understanding the different perspectives.

Discussing through dialogue or dialectics can still be aimed at discovering truth or obtaining knowledge, yet it prioritizes collaboration and considering alternate viewpoints rather than winning an argument. When person engages in dialectics, they're entering a discourse with the intention of exchanging flawed or false beliefs for knowledge by scrutinizing and understanding various perspectives.

User Kert Kukk
by
7.2k points