Final answer:
Euthanasia is a controversial topic that raises ethical and moral debates. Some philosophers argue against it based on the wrongness of killing and the potential for misuse, while others, like Peter Singer, support it from a utilitarian perspective. James Rachels challenges the view that active euthanasia is morally wrong, suggesting it may actually result in less suffering.
Step-by-step explanation:
Euthanasia is a highly controversial topic with ethical, moral, and practical considerations. Some philosophers argue against euthanasia, stating that the harm it causes to the community outweighs the benefits of ending suffering. They focus on the wrongness of killing, the role of a physician, and the potential slippery slope if euthanasia becomes widespread. However, other philosophers, like Peter Singer, support euthanasia from a utilitarian perspective, believing it can help avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. James Rachels challenges the view that active euthanasia is morally wrong, suggesting that it may actually result in less suffering than passive euthanasia.