178k views
1 vote
In 3-5 sentences, do you believe that transforming everyday objects should be considered art? why or why not? explain.

Options:
a. Yes, because it enhances creativity and challenges conventional perspectives
b. No, as it undermines the value of traditional art forms
c. Yes, it fosters innovation and showcases diverse artistic expressions
d. No, it lacks the depth and cultural significance of established art forms

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

Transforming everyday objects into art is valid as it promotes creativity, innovation, and diverse expressions, contributing to personal and communal awareness.

Step-by-step explanation:

I believe that transforming everyday objects should be considered art, option (a), because it enhances creativity and challenges conventional perspectives. This transformation fosters innovation and allows for diverse artistic expressions that may not conform to traditional boundaries. Engaging in such art-making can attune us to our surroundings, encourage us to take creative risks, and teach us about ourselves and about life, by seeing the mundane transformed into something unique and thought-provoking. It's a way for people to contribute to the awareness and understanding of their lives, and the lives of their communities. Moreover, this type of art can impact the views of a society and preserve aspects of life that might otherwise be overlooked.

User TomLisankie
by
9.1k points