Question

There are different types of judicial philosophies for Supreme Court Justices. Strict constructionism is the idea that justices should see what the text of the Constitution says and try not to interpret anything more than that. Loose constructionism is the idea that justices can read into the Constitution what was meant by the founding fathers and the prior Supreme Court justices.

True or False

Answer 1

Strict constructionism and loose constructionism are two different philosophies of judicial interpretation. Strict constructionism adheres to the literal interpretation of the Constitution, while loose constructionism allows for broader interpretation.

Step-by-step explanation:

True. Strict constructionism is the idea that justices should interpret the Constitution based on its exact wording and not expand on its meaning. This approach focuses on the original intent of the framers and limits judicial interpretation to the text itself. On the other hand, loose constructionism or judicial activism allows justices to interpret the Constitution more broadly, taking into account societal changes and personal beliefs. It allows for reading between the lines and finding implied rights that may not be explicitly stated in the Constitution.