Final answer:
The governments of Japan, North Korea, and the Philippines differ in their attention to the will of the people in terms of their form of government, role of the constitution, and adherence to the rule of law.
Step-by-step explanation:
The governments of Japan, North Korea, and the Philippines differ in their attention to the will of the people through several aspects including the form of government, the role of the constitution, and the adherence to the rule of law. These elements collectively impact how each nation regards and enforces the will of the populace.
Japan is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary government where the will of the people is expressed through elected representatives. The constitution plays a critical role as the supreme law of the land, and the rule of law is a fundamental principle.
North Korea, on the other hand, is a totalitarian state with a dynastic leadership. Here, the government's attention to the will of the people is minimal as it exhibits absolute control over many aspects of life, and the rule of law is subordinate to the dictates of the ruling Kim family.
The Philippines is a democratic republic with a presidential system. The will of the people is significant as they directly elect their leaders. The constitution is a guiding document for governance, and the rule of law holds a central place in government operations.
When addressing the question of how these governments differ in their attention to the will of the people, we can conclude that the answer is d. All of the above.