Final answer:
A writer can prove a claim by providing a variety of evidence including different quotes and event summaries, and by explaining how each piece of evidence supports the claim. A single strong piece of evidence is less convincing than multiple pieces that are properly cited and explained. The correct option is B.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to prove a claim within the context of literary analysis or any academic writing, a writer must supply sufficient evidence to convince the reader of the argument's validity. Evidence can come in the form of direct quotes, paraphrased material, factual data, and logical reasoning. To most effectively support a claim, one should provide different pieces of textual evidence that can include quotes or summaries of events from the text that are relevant to the claim. Additionally, it is also imperative to offer an explanation of how each piece of evidence supports the overall argument, considering that different readers may interpret the same piece of evidence in different ways. In the context of academic writing, using a single piece of evidence might not be as persuasive as utilizing a variety of evidence to support the same point.
When selecting evidence, it is crucial to choose the most effective types that directly reinforce the reasoning behind your point. This might involve quoting authoritative sources, summarizing central ideas, or paraphrasing important concepts. No matter the type of evidence chosen, it must be accompanied by analysis, interpreting the evidence, and explicating why it is relevant to the claim. Proper citation, whether quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing, is also essential, as it lends credibility to the argument and allows readers to track down sources for further investigation.