Final answer:
Rufus' home was comfortable and well-furnished, unlike the basic and cramped quarters of the slaves. Both Dana's and the student's present-day homes provide modern amenities and personal space far beyond what was available to slaves.
Step-by-step explanation:
The comparison between Rufus' home, the slaves' homes, Dana's home, and the student's personal residence highlights the stark contrasts in living conditions experienced during the time of slavery. Rufus likely lived in a comfortable and spacious home, evident from historical descriptions of planter's homes, with structured facilities, proper furnishing, and maintained grounds catering to a lifestyle of relative luxury.
Meanwhile, the slaves' quarters, as indicated by historical references, were often cramped, rudimentary, and lacked basic comforts and privacy, reflecting their dehumanized status and the hardship they endured on a daily basis. Comparatively, Dana's home in modern times would be far more similar to the student's home, with amenities, personal space, and a level of comfort that greatly surpasses that of the slaves' living quarters.