Final answer:
Deciding whether to donate to a stranger involves a personal reflection on one's values and the situation of the person in need. Carnegie's approach emphasizes assistance that enables self-improvement, while recognizing unique circumstances that might urge one to donate. Alternatively, some opt to support established NGOs to ensure effective use of donations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether to donate to a stranger on the street is deeply personal and depends on one's values and assessment of the situation. For some, the desire to directly help those in immediate need without hesitation reflects a commitment to unconditional aid (option a). Others might choose to donate after verifying the individual's need (option b) to avoid enabling a situation where the donation might not be used as intended.
Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth suggests that charity should aim to help those who will help themselves and cautions against alms-giving that could potentially harm more than help. His view encourages evaluating the worthiness of the recipient, advocating for assistance that enables self-improvement rather than creates dependency.
When considering subjective poverty, it's essential to recognize that everyone's circumstances are unique. Whether it's someone escaping domestic abuse, an immigrant starting anew, or a homeless person needing a meal, each scenario might influence an individual's decision to give. Additionally, some people prefer donating through NGOs like the Red Cross, which have structured programs aimed at aiding in crises and ensuring donations are utilized effectively.