Question

In that speech, she said, "One must accept the proposition that a difference in judging will be by the presence of women and people of color on the bench. Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see. My hope is that I will take the good from my experiences and extrapolate them further into areas with which I am unfamiliar. But I accept there will be some difference based on my gender and my Latina heritage."

Correctly identify the type of reasoning used in this passage.

Answer 1

The reasoning in the passage is inductive reasoning, where the speaker utilizes personal experiences to inform her perspective on judging and acknowledges that these experiences will influence her judgments as a reflection of her gender and Latina heritage.

Step-by-step explanation:

The type of reasoning used in the passage provided is inductive reasoning, where the speaker draws general conclusions from personal experiences and acknowledges that these will influence her judgments to some extent.

She posits that these experiences, based on gender and heritage, will inevitably affect the ways in which she perceives and interprets certain facts when compared to other judges who may have different backgrounds.

The speaker's reference to her anticipation of using the positive aspects of her experiences to inform her understanding in unfamiliar areas, along with accepting potential biases informed by her identity, underscores the complexity of judicial decision-making.

This inductive reasoning is tied with the notion that judges' backgrounds and experiences can contribute to the diversity of perspectives within the legal system.