Final answer:
The contract between Christine and Chuck in this scenario is void due to the fact that Christine is not authorized to access the server and it contains trade secrets from her employer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The contract between Christine and Chuck in this scenario is void due to the fact that Christine is not authorized to access the server and it contains trade secrets from her employer. One of the essential elements of a valid contract is legality, and since the contract involves the sale of a server containing confidential information, it goes against the law.
In this situation, the transaction would likely be considered illegal and unenforceable. Additionally, Chuck may also be held liable for participating in a potential breach of trade secrets if he proceeds with the purchase.
It is important to abide by laws and ethical standards when entering into contracts to ensure their validity and avoid potential legal consequences.