Final answer:
According to Natural Law and the Principle of Double-effect, the use of abortion in a life-threatening situation for the pregnant mother is a complex ethical dilemma. Natural Law holds that intentionally ending a human life, such as through abortion, is morally wrong. However, the Principle of Double-effect allows for indirect harm if the intention is to achieve a good outcome. In this situation, using abortion to save the mother's life could be seen as permissible under the Principle of Double-effect.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Natural Law and the Principle of Double-effect, the decision to use abortion in the case of a pregnant mother suffering a life-threatening situation is a complex ethical dilemma. Natural Law holds that the preservation of human life is of primary importance, and taking any action that intentionally ends a human life, such as abortion, would be considered morally wrong. However, the Principle of Double-effect allows for indirect harm to be caused if the intention is to achieve a good outcome and the harm is not intended. In the case of a pregnant mother facing a life-threatening situation, using abortion as a means to save her life could be seen as permissible according to the Principle of Double-effect, as the intention is to preserve the mother's life and the harm (the termination of the fetus) is not the intended end. It is important to note that different ethical perspectives may have different views on this matter.