Final answer:
There are three types of criteria available for evaluating work on the assignment workbench: Criteria (standards or measurable attributes), Constraints (limitations that must be met), and Evidence (data to support evaluations based on the criteria and constraints).
Step-by-step explanation:
When assessing work on the assignment workbench, there are three types of criteria available:
- Criteria: These are the standards or measurable attributes by which the quality of a design is judged. Examples include weight and size.
- Constraints: These are limitations or conditions that must be satisfied by the design and the design process.
- Evidence: This refers to the specific data or information used to support judgments based on the criteria and constraints.
Before evaluating, one should review all criteria and guidelines for the assignment. Reading the assignment thoroughly is vital before offering any feedback. Additionally, one should understand and use any peer review exercises, tools, or instruments provided. Evidence used in evaluation depends on the subject, audience, and the use of the evaluation. For example, criteria will vary if one is evaluating a scientific report versus a piece of creative writing. Providing objective evidence is essential to support any evaluation, and criteria may change depending on the genre or subgenre of the work being reviewed.